<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bill Foster promises pork</title>
	<atom:link href="http://elginite.org/blog/2008/06/22/bill-foster-pork-barrel-spending/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://elginite.org/blog/2008/06/22/bill-foster-pork-barrel-spending/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 04:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: rm</title>
		<link>http://elginite.org/blog/2008/06/22/bill-foster-pork-barrel-spending/#comment-45071</link>
		<dc:creator>rm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 03:06:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elginite.org/blog/2008/06/22/bill-foster-pork-barrel-spending/#comment-45071</guid>
		<description>Well, the news this week has Foster spending the public money on a "fact-finding" mission down to the Mexican border where his "scientific" mind no doubt will discover that Mexicans are illegally entering the United States.  I hope he can survive the shock.

He could have saved himself the hassle, saved us the money, and gotten a much fuller picture of the problem by dropping by a few places in Elgin.  For starters he might want to place a call over to Leo Nelson at the Chamber of Commerce.  It would be a good chance to ask Leo why the US Chamber continues to lobby, despite increasing American unemployment, for "immigration reform" bringing into the country more millions of peon laborers for the jobs they can't send to Mexico, India or China.  And then Dr. Science could stop off at the Police Station to ask Chief Womack about the illegal alien gang members arrested this week in Elgin and whether this development has changed the Chief's opinion that "immigration" has had no connection to organized crime in Elgin.  Foster also truly could do us all a service by finding out who employs the Mexican gangsters when they're not out hustling drugs, shooting people or engaged in their other recreations.  According to today's Herald 48 "undocumented immigrants" (love those euphemisms) were arrested in the area this week for gang activity.  Who employees them?  I suspect there are powerful business and political forces that don't want that information released, but as a Congressman Foster could do us all a genuine favor by finding those facts.  That is, if he really wants to find facts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the news this week has Foster spending the public money on a &#8220;fact-finding&#8221; mission down to the Mexican border where his &#8220;scientific&#8221; mind no doubt will discover that Mexicans are illegally entering the United States.  I hope he can survive the shock.</p>
<p>He could have saved himself the hassle, saved us the money, and gotten a much fuller picture of the problem by dropping by a few places in Elgin.  For starters he might want to place a call over to Leo Nelson at the Chamber of Commerce.  It would be a good chance to ask Leo why the US Chamber continues to lobby, despite increasing American unemployment, for &#8220;immigration reform&#8221; bringing into the country more millions of peon laborers for the jobs they can&#8217;t send to Mexico, India or China.  And then Dr. Science could stop off at the Police Station to ask Chief Womack about the illegal alien gang members arrested this week in Elgin and whether this development has changed the Chief&#8217;s opinion that &#8220;immigration&#8221; has had no connection to organized crime in Elgin.  Foster also truly could do us all a service by finding out who employs the Mexican gangsters when they&#8217;re not out hustling drugs, shooting people or engaged in their other recreations.  According to today&#8217;s Herald 48 &#8220;undocumented immigrants&#8221; (love those euphemisms) were arrested in the area this week for gang activity.  Who employees them?  I suspect there are powerful business and political forces that don&#8217;t want that information released, but as a Congressman Foster could do us all a genuine favor by finding those facts.  That is, if he really wants to find facts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RS</title>
		<link>http://elginite.org/blog/2008/06/22/bill-foster-pork-barrel-spending/#comment-45021</link>
		<dc:creator>RS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 01:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elginite.org/blog/2008/06/22/bill-foster-pork-barrel-spending/#comment-45021</guid>
		<description>It's important to keep in mind that these are just requests made in an election year. Nothing has been secured.

But the issue isn't about federal funding here. 

It's about promising one thing and doing another. When you're campaigning on the promise of fighting out of control spending and then turn around and request more than $55M in pork for your district, it just shows poor leadership and character.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s important to keep in mind that these are just requests made in an election year. Nothing has been secured.</p>
<p>But the issue isn&#8217;t about federal funding here. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s about promising one thing and doing another. When you&#8217;re campaigning on the promise of fighting out of control spending and then turn around and request more than $55M in pork for your district, it just shows poor leadership and character.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J</title>
		<link>http://elginite.org/blog/2008/06/22/bill-foster-pork-barrel-spending/#comment-45020</link>
		<dc:creator>J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 00:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elginite.org/blog/2008/06/22/bill-foster-pork-barrel-spending/#comment-45020</guid>
		<description>Bill Foster secured federal money for our district that otherwise would have gone somewhere else.

Wow, the nerve.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill Foster secured federal money for our district that otherwise would have gone somewhere else.</p>
<p>Wow, the nerve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rm</title>
		<link>http://elginite.org/blog/2008/06/22/bill-foster-pork-barrel-spending/#comment-45018</link>
		<dc:creator>rm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 01:56:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elginite.org/blog/2008/06/22/bill-foster-pork-barrel-spending/#comment-45018</guid>
		<description>From R. Swan's comments, apparently Foster has already disappointed the flagburner constituency which is such a vibrant part of the modern Democratic party.  Nevertheless, how could any responsible American politician do otherwise?  Note R. Swan's reference to "the modern Repub party and their 100 yrs of war."  Gee, are we now to understand that, to use R. Swan's idiom, Woodrow Wilson's war, Franklin D. Roosevelt's war, Harry Truman's war, and Jack Kennedy's and Lyndon Johnson's war were "Repub" wars?  One does read a lot about the historical imbecility of Americans, but with the perverted perpective that R. Swan exhibits it's no wonder he represents a constituency just this side of the Klan in terms of respectabilty.   The only "Repub war" the Democrats truly opposed was Abraham Lincoln's war and that was because Abe was threatening the plantation system that has always been at the heart of the Democratic party's existence. Go down to the Lincoln museum in Springfield and you'll see examples of the Democrats' hatred of Lincoln that make the flagburners' hatred of Bush look absolutely charitable. Of course, the party recovered quite nicely from those Copperhead days and has just embarked on their third century of finding new ways to sustain itself by isolating and exploiting black Americans. "Meet the new boss," indeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From R. Swan&#8217;s comments, apparently Foster has already disappointed the flagburner constituency which is such a vibrant part of the modern Democratic party.  Nevertheless, how could any responsible American politician do otherwise?  Note R. Swan&#8217;s reference to &#8220;the modern Repub party and their 100 yrs of war.&#8221;  Gee, are we now to understand that, to use R. Swan&#8217;s idiom, Woodrow Wilson&#8217;s war, Franklin D. Roosevelt&#8217;s war, Harry Truman&#8217;s war, and Jack Kennedy&#8217;s and Lyndon Johnson&#8217;s war were &#8220;Repub&#8221; wars?  One does read a lot about the historical imbecility of Americans, but with the perverted perpective that R. Swan exhibits it&#8217;s no wonder he represents a constituency just this side of the Klan in terms of respectabilty.   The only &#8220;Repub war&#8221; the Democrats truly opposed was Abraham Lincoln&#8217;s war and that was because Abe was threatening the plantation system that has always been at the heart of the Democratic party&#8217;s existence. Go down to the Lincoln museum in Springfield and you&#8217;ll see examples of the Democrats&#8217; hatred of Lincoln that make the flagburners&#8217; hatred of Bush look absolutely charitable. Of course, the party recovered quite nicely from those Copperhead days and has just embarked on their third century of finding new ways to sustain itself by isolating and exploiting black Americans. &#8220;Meet the new boss,&#8221; indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RS</title>
		<link>http://elginite.org/blog/2008/06/22/bill-foster-pork-barrel-spending/#comment-45017</link>
		<dc:creator>RS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 04:12:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elginite.org/blog/2008/06/22/bill-foster-pork-barrel-spending/#comment-45017</guid>
		<description>Thank you both for your comments.

I don't mind that Mr. Foster is making federal funding requests. I just think it's ironic that he was criticizing other people for out of control spending and then turns around and requests $55.8M in pork, and doing it very publicly in an election year.

It doesn't have anything to do with being a Democrat or a Republican. Tim Schmitz, a Republican is another person who did something similar. Just a week before an election, he said he was introducing some tax-cutting legislation, which he conceded would never get passed.

Whichever party is concerned, it's the same political garbage. 

Anybody who thought that the real changes that Bill Foster was talking about were positive changes, well perhaps it's time to evaluate his record. From what I've seen recently it's not impressive, and that's from a conservative standpoint. From the left, R. Swan's comment seems to suggest that Mr. Foster has betrayed his base, and has already changed positions to fit whatever he thinks will get him re-elected.

Mr. Foster in his short time in his office has already shown himself to be a politician of convenience, not one of conviction or principal.

Jim Oberweis has often been criticized as not being likable enough. And sure that matters to some extent, but where it really matters, on character, convictions and principles, you can't help but admire his willingness to take stands that are not popular but correct--or which at least he believes to be correct.

I don't agree with Mr. Oberweis on all issues, but I respect his ability to stick by his beliefs whether they will get him elected or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you both for your comments.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t mind that Mr. Foster is making federal funding requests. I just think it&#8217;s ironic that he was criticizing other people for out of control spending and then turns around and requests $55.8M in pork, and doing it very publicly in an election year.</p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t have anything to do with being a Democrat or a Republican. Tim Schmitz, a Republican is another person who did something similar. Just a week before an election, he said he was introducing some tax-cutting legislation, which he conceded would never get passed.</p>
<p>Whichever party is concerned, it&#8217;s the same political garbage. </p>
<p>Anybody who thought that the real changes that Bill Foster was talking about were positive changes, well perhaps it&#8217;s time to evaluate his record. From what I&#8217;ve seen recently it&#8217;s not impressive, and that&#8217;s from a conservative standpoint. From the left, R. Swan&#8217;s comment seems to suggest that Mr. Foster has betrayed his base, and has already changed positions to fit whatever he thinks will get him re-elected.</p>
<p>Mr. Foster in his short time in his office has already shown himself to be a politician of convenience, not one of conviction or principal.</p>
<p>Jim Oberweis has often been criticized as not being likable enough. And sure that matters to some extent, but where it really matters, on character, convictions and principles, you can&#8217;t help but admire his willingness to take stands that are not popular but correct&#8211;or which at least he believes to be correct.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t agree with Mr. Oberweis on all issues, but I respect his ability to stick by his beliefs whether they will get him elected or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R. Swan</title>
		<link>http://elginite.org/blog/2008/06/22/bill-foster-pork-barrel-spending/#comment-45016</link>
		<dc:creator>R. Swan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 05:33:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elginite.org/blog/2008/06/22/bill-foster-pork-barrel-spending/#comment-45016</guid>
		<description>Maybe if Foster had the guts to have voted against George Bush's war last week, there would be funds for helping people in his district.

Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.

And nobody excels at deficit spending like the modern Repub party and their 100 yrs of war.

Shame Foster doesn't have the guts to fight it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe if Foster had the guts to have voted against George Bush&#8217;s war last week, there would be funds for helping people in his district.</p>
<p>Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.</p>
<p>And nobody excels at deficit spending like the modern Repub party and their 100 yrs of war.</p>
<p>Shame Foster doesn&#8217;t have the guts to fight it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob_N</title>
		<link>http://elginite.org/blog/2008/06/22/bill-foster-pork-barrel-spending/#comment-45015</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob_N</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 02:49:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elginite.org/blog/2008/06/22/bill-foster-pork-barrel-spending/#comment-45015</guid>
		<description>So according to you he's damned if he does and damned if he doesn't, eh?

He can make his &lt;i&gt;requests&lt;/i&gt; public and open himself up to your spin and complaints or he can keep things secret and hidden, which you would likely complain about as well.

To the point, however, these are Rep. Foster's requests for your district. Not all the requests are going to make it through despite your apparent lack of comprehension.

At least he's being open and honest about his requests and won't profit from a Boy &amp; Girls Club grant or a parking garage... unlike a certain former Congressman who benefited quite handsomely from the secretive Prairie Parkway deal. No wonder Rep. Hastert "believed there was plenty of time to celebrate accomplishments after the fact but saw little use in notifying the media until the job was done."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So according to you he&#8217;s damned if he does and damned if he doesn&#8217;t, eh?</p>
<p>He can make his <i>requests</i> public and open himself up to your spin and complaints or he can keep things secret and hidden, which you would likely complain about as well.</p>
<p>To the point, however, these are Rep. Foster&#8217;s requests for your district. Not all the requests are going to make it through despite your apparent lack of comprehension.</p>
<p>At least he&#8217;s being open and honest about his requests and won&#8217;t profit from a Boy &amp; Girls Club grant or a parking garage&#8230; unlike a certain former Congressman who benefited quite handsomely from the secretive Prairie Parkway deal. No wonder Rep. Hastert &#8220;believed there was plenty of time to celebrate accomplishments after the fact but saw little use in notifying the media until the job was done.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

